GoDaddy Challenges Delhi HC Order Ending Domain Privacy

GoDaddy Challenges Delhi HC Order Ending Domain Privacy

GoDaddy Challenges Delhi HC Order Ending Domain Privacy

https://www.medianama.com/2026/07/223-godaddy-delhi-high-court-domain-privacy-case-appeal/

Publish Date: 2026-07-04 03:04:00

Source Domain: www.medianama.com

  • The December order can be accessed here.

GoDaddy, the world’s largest domain registrar, has challenged the Delhi High Court’s (HC) December order on fraudulent websites before a larger bench, arguing that the directions strip privacy protections from legitimate website owners and force it to police domain names worldwide, Reuters reported after reviewing non-public filings. Namecheap and Hosting Concepts filed separate challenges. The larger bench will hear the appeals on July 16.

The order in question is the Dabur India v. Ashok Kumar judgment, delivered on December 24, 2025, by Justice Prathiba M. Singh. Among the 14 directions issued to registrars, three are central to the appeal. The court directed them to:

  • Run electronic Know Your Customer (e-KYC) verification for all domain registrations, with periodic re-verification.
  • Stop offering privacy-by-default masking, making identity redaction a paid add-on rather than the default.
  • Disclose registrant details within 72 hours when requested by a court, a law enforcement agency, or a rights holder.

What is GoDaddy contesting? Its appeal, which Reuters reported runs to more than 5,000 pages, challenges three of the directions:

  • Ending privacy-by-default: Publishing every registrant’s name, address, phone number, and email address exposes legitimate owners to stalking and harassment. GoDaddy continues to market “free privacy protection forever.”
  • The 72-hour disclosure requirement for anyone with a “legitimate interest”: GoDaddy argues that it cannot determine who qualifies as having a legitimate interest.
  • The bar on brand-name variations: GoDaddy calls it unworkable, since “McDonald” is a common Scottish surname and a string like “HUL” would collide with 118 English words including “hulk” and “moghul.”

Does the privacy argument hold under Indian law? GoDaddy argues that removing privacy-by-default violates the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP)…

Source