Hacking Salesforce Sites With an LLM Agent

Hacking Salesforce Sites With an LLM Agent

Hacking Salesforce Sites With an LLM Agent

https://thehackernews.com/expert-insights/2026/06/hacking-salesforce-sites-with-llm-agent.html

Publish Date: 2026-06-08 02:46:00

Source Domain: thehackernews.com

AI is changing the security landscape. More and more threat groups incorporate LLMs into their reconnaissance and exploitation workflows. The notion that some vulnerabilities are too complex to implement is now obsolete. Using LLMs, hackers can automatically find and exploit complex vulnerabilities. We have all heard of Claude Mythos and its ability to identify vulnerabilities in large codebases and exploit them automatically. But LLMs can do more than find vulnerabilities in code.

ShinyHunters has scanned thousands of Salesforce Sites. They used a modified version of “AuraInspector”. They possibly used an LLM to code their framework, mods, reconnaissance tools, and other aspects of their workflow. But the next step is to use AI to supercharge the attack process itself. We at Reco decided to explore what it would look like.

Reco’s security research team built an AI-powered agent capable of performing end-to-end security assessments of Salesforce Experience Cloud sites – fully autonomously. Give it a URL, and it discovers the attack surface, analyzes every exposed endpoint, identifies vulnerabilities, writes working exploits, and runs them. No human guidance required after providing the target.

We pointed it at real-world Salesforce sites belonging to major technology companies, and the results were sobering. The agent discovered high-severity vulnerabilities on sites belonging to organizations that invest heavily in security. It wrote working exploit scripts from scratch, extracted real data, and even autonomously retrieved data from public sources to build payload input when needed.

The End-to-End Security Analyst

Our agent is not a single monolithic script. It’s an agentic pipeline of AI skills, each responsible for a distinct phase of the assessment. A human researcher would follow a similar workflow: reconnaissance, analysis, exploitation, validation. The difference is that every phase is executed by an LLM that can reason about what it sees, adapt its…

Source