Connecticut can strengthen safety online without sacrificing privacy

Connecticut can strengthen safety online without sacrificing privacy

Connecticut can strengthen safety online without sacrificing privacy

https://ctmirror.org/2026/03/19/connecticut-can-strengthen-safety-online-without-sacrificing-privacy/

Publish Date: 2026-03-19 00:01:00

Source Domain: ctmirror.org

Connecticut lawmakers deserve credit for taking on one of the most difficult and most important issues in technology policy: how to improve online safety for younger users. Parents have stressed that they want tools that help them guide their children, and policymakers understandably strive to respond to growing concerns about how children experience digital spaces.

House Bill 5037 reflects those commendable intentions. However, as drafted, the bill risks taking away the many tools parents already have, and replacing it with a system that undermines privacy protections for all consumers, and raises serious First Amendment concerns.

HB 5037 would impose sweeping requirements on platforms that recommend or prioritize user-generated content. The bill restricts how services can use personal or device information to recommend content to minors unless age verification or parental consent requirements are met. Also, the bill mandates recurring warning labels about mental health risks, limits notifications, requires default content restrictions, and establishes strict design mandates.

While well-intentioned, these prescriptive rules heighten concerns about access to information, and privacy. 

Kyle Sepe

Age verification requirements, in particular, raise pivotal privacy questions due to the additional personal information companies would have to collect to prove compliance. The more accurate an age assurance system aims to be, the more sensitive information it often requires. This can include requiring government IDs, biometric or facial recognition data, or additional personal details.

Creating new systems that collect and process this data increases risks for users, including minors, while moving further away from widely accepted data-minimization principles. Policies meant to protect children online shouldn’t unintentionally require families to share more personal information than they do today. 

The bill also raises significant…

Source