{"id":275234,"date":"2026-06-18T03:58:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-18T07:58:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/2026\/06\/18\/canada-rights-groups-calls-for-privacy-legislation-regulating-federal-political-parties-jurist\/"},"modified":"2026-06-18T04:15:12","modified_gmt":"2026-06-18T08:15:12","slug":"canada-rights-groups-calls-for-privacy-legislation-regulating-federal-political-parties-jurist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/2026\/06\/18\/canada-rights-groups-calls-for-privacy-legislation-regulating-federal-political-parties-jurist\/","title":{"rendered":"Canada rights groups calls for privacy legislation regulating federal political parties &#8211; JURIST"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jurist.org\/news\/2026\/06\/canada-rights-groups-calls-for-privacy-legislation-regulating-federal-political-parties\/\">Canada rights groups calls for privacy legislation regulating federal political parties &#8211; JURIST<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jurist.org\/news\/2026\/06\/canada-rights-groups-calls-for-privacy-legislation-regulating-federal-political-parties\/\">https:\/\/www.jurist.org\/news\/2026\/06\/canada-rights-groups-calls-for-privacy-legislation-regulating-federal-political-parties\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Publish Date: <a href=\"publish_date]\">2026-06-18 03:58:00<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Source Domain: <a href=\"www.jurist.org\">www.jurist.org<\/a><\/p>\n<p>A coalition of Canadian civil rights groups called for privacy legislation that regulates the collection of personal information by federal political parties on Wednesday. The appeal comes months after Parliament removed the related law in March.<\/p>\n<p>The statement said federal political parties remain left out in the current Canadian privacy framework, allowing them to collect voters\u2019 information, such as addresses, demographics, and issue preferences, without external oversight. The groups cited that 80 percent of Canadians believe that privacy legislation should apply to federal political parties as it does to the private sector.<\/p>\n<p>The statement calls on all federal political parties to legislate a regulatory framework on the collection of personal information by federal political parties before the next election. It also calls for the repeal of legislation that does not guarantee independent oversight.<\/p>\n<p>There were two major legislative changes to the current privacy framework regulating federal political parties this year. In March, Parliament passed Bill C-4, which comprised several changes to the country\u2019s income, excise, and carbon taxes. The bill had also buried amendments to the Canadian Elections Act. The amendment removed the requirement to submit a personal information protection policy to the Chief Electoral Officer to register as a party. It also deemed such a requirement to have never been in force, exempting parties from privacy infringements over the last two decades.<\/p>\n<p>Another Bill C-25, passed on June 11, brought back the parties\u2019 requirement to report their privacy policy and notify voters of a data breach. Yet Michael Geist, a privacy law professor at the University of Ottawa, criticized the bill for imposing the \u201cleast onerous\u201d privacy obligations on the parties and lacking key safeguards such as limits on the purpose of collection and data retention. He also added that the independent watchdog continues to lack jurisdiction over the parties in&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jurist.org\/news\/2026\/06\/canada-rights-groups-calls-for-privacy-legislation-regulating-federal-political-parties\/\">Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Canada rights groups calls for privacy legislation regulating federal political parties &#8211; JURIST https:\/\/www.jurist.org\/news\/2026\/06\/canada-rights-groups-calls-for-privacy-legislation-regulating-federal-political-parties\/ Publish&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":275235,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.jurist.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2022\/01\/vote_1641250197.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[30],"class_list":["post-275234","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-privacy","tag-breach"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/275234"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=275234"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/275234\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":275236,"href":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/275234\/revisions\/275236"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/275235"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=275234"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=275234"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=275234"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}