{"id":275090,"date":"2026-06-17T23:26:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-18T03:26:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/2026\/06\/17\/stuttering-law-a-manifesto-on-play-interpretation-and-artificial-intelligence-jurist-commentary\/"},"modified":"2026-06-18T00:00:17","modified_gmt":"2026-06-18T04:00:17","slug":"stuttering-law-a-manifesto-on-play-interpretation-and-artificial-intelligence-jurist-commentary","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/2026\/06\/17\/stuttering-law-a-manifesto-on-play-interpretation-and-artificial-intelligence-jurist-commentary\/","title":{"rendered":"Stuttering Law: A Manifesto on Play, Interpretation, and Artificial Intelligence &#8211; JURIST &#8211; Commentary"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jurist.org\/commentary\/2026\/06\/stuttering-law-a-manifesto-on-play-interpretation-and-artificial-intelligence\/\">Stuttering Law: A Manifesto on Play, Interpretation, and Artificial Intelligence &#8211; JURIST &#8211; Commentary<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jurist.org\/commentary\/2026\/06\/stuttering-law-a-manifesto-on-play-interpretation-and-artificial-intelligence\/\">https:\/\/www.jurist.org\/commentary\/2026\/06\/stuttering-law-a-manifesto-on-play-interpretation-and-artificial-intelligence\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Publish Date: <a href=\"publish_date]\">2026-06-17 23:26:00<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Source Domain: <a href=\"www.jurist.org\">www.jurist.org<\/a><\/p>\n<p>If legal interpretation is no longer purely human but distributed across judges, archives, and algorithms, then who is responsible for a judgment \u2014 and on what authority does it rest? A philosophical case that AI is changing the answers.<\/p>\n<p>I still remember the children in the courtyard of our apartment building. There were only two boys among a larger group of girls, and yet one of the most serious negotiations of their small world revolved around a strangely precise question: who would play the husband. What appeared, from the distance of adulthood, as a trivial or even absurd game was in fact the construction of a miniature normative universe. Roles were not simply chosen; they were argued over, redistributed, justified, contested, and occasionally imposed. The children did not merely imitate a social order that already existed outside them; they generated one in real time, with a seriousness that did not depend on adult recognition in order to be binding within its own horizon.<\/p>\n<p>What is striking in retrospect is not the content of their imagination, but the structural logic of it. The game was not a space of arbitrary freedom, but a space of emergent constraint. A disagreement would immediately require a rule; a rule would require interpretation; interpretation would create asymmetries; asymmetries would demand correction; and correction would open the possibility of a new rule. In this sense, their play was already a primitive jurisprudence: not in the sense that it resembled law superficially, but in the sense that it reproduced law\u2019s most fundamental temporal structure, namely the continuous production of normativity through situated interpretation.<\/p>\n<p>Years later, I encountered philosophical descriptions of play that suddenly illuminated this memory in a different light. In particular, the hermeneutic tradition associated with Hans-Georg Gadamer\u2014in The Relevance of the Beautiful (Die Aktualit\u00e4t des Sch\u00f6nen, 1974)\u2014articulates play not as an activity&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jurist.org\/commentary\/2026\/06\/stuttering-law-a-manifesto-on-play-interpretation-and-artificial-intelligence\/\">Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Stuttering Law: A Manifesto on Play, Interpretation, and Artificial Intelligence &#8211; JURIST &#8211; Commentary https:\/\/www.jurist.org\/commentary\/2026\/06\/stuttering-law-a-manifesto-on-play-interpretation-and-artificial-intelligence\/&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":275091,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.jurist.org\/commentary\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2026\/06\/ai_legal_1781753327.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-275090","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-artificial-intelligence"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/275090"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=275090"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/275090\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":275092,"href":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/275090\/revisions\/275092"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/275091"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=275090"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=275090"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=275090"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}