{"id":210240,"date":"2026-02-05T05:14:00","date_gmt":"2026-02-05T10:14:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/2026\/02\/05\/apple-leaks-its-own-macbook-pro-reveal-m5-max-and-m5-ultra-chips-found-in-latest-beta\/"},"modified":"2026-02-05T06:25:08","modified_gmt":"2026-02-05T11:25:08","slug":"apple-leaks-its-own-macbook-pro-reveal-m5-max-and-m5-ultra-chips-found-in-latest-beta","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/news-you-need.com\/index.php\/2026\/02\/05\/apple-leaks-its-own-macbook-pro-reveal-m5-max-and-m5-ultra-chips-found-in-latest-beta\/","title":{"rendered":"Apple leaks its own MacBook Pro reveal: M5 Max and M5 Ultra chips found in latest beta"},"content":{"rendered":"

Apple leaks its own MacBook Pro reveal: M5 Max and M5 Ultra chips found in latest beta<\/a><\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.tomsguide.com\/computing\/macbooks\/apple-leaks-its-own-macbook-pro-reveal-m5-max-and-m5-ultra-chips-found-in-latest-beta<\/a><\/p>\n

Publish Date: 2026-02-05 05:14:00<\/a><\/p>\n

Source Domain: www.tomsguide.com<\/a><\/p>\n

The wait is nearly over. The MacBook Pro M5 Pro and M5 Max launch looks imminent, and Apple seemingly just leaked its own upcoming chips in an iOS beta \u2014 even including a reference to M5 Ultra.<\/p>\n

Code spotted in the iOS 26.3 beta by user Nicol\u00e1s Alvarez (via MacRumors) includes references to two new M5 chips: H17C (T6051) and H17D (T6052). The current MacBook Pro M5’s chip reference is H17G, with the “17” indicating it’s part of the M5 family.<\/p>\n

This shows these unreleased chips are M5 variants for upcoming MacBook Pro models. Interestingly, when referencing chips, Apple uses “C” for its Max SoCs, and “D” for its Ultra models. In this case, it means we can expect M5 Max and M5 Ultra.<\/p>\n


\nYou may like
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

An M5 Ultra MacBook Pro?<\/h2>\n

\n

(Image credit: Future \/ Apple)<\/span><\/p>\n

We’ve been anticipating M5 Pro and M5 Max MacBook Pro models, but there’s no sign of an H17S in the beta, with “S” used for Pro chips. Now, Apple may have simply not included a reference for its M5 Pro chip, or it could be changing up its reference numbering.<\/p>\n

However, this leads to two possibilities:<\/p>\n