Why we shouldn’t abandon handwriting at school
Why we shouldn’t abandon handwriting at school
https://theconversation.com/why-we-shouldnt-abandon-handwriting-at-school-276210
Publish Date: 2026-03-02 11:14:00
Source Domain: theconversation.com
Over the decades, technological devices have been gradually integrated into language learning, as is recently the case with generative artificial intelligence (AI).
Does the sophistication of these tools eventually render pencils and pens obsolete? Or can digital uses be combined with manual writing? How does writing keep its value for the human being?
Pen or keyboard: an impact on memorisation
Handwriting has long been associated with memory and learning. It was in 1829 that the keystroke first appeared. It, thereafter, became common in 1867 thanks to the first manual typewriter. While students of the past learned to write exclusively by hand, today’s students alternate between screens and paper. However, research shows that these modalities do not have the same effects on memorisation and retention, and essentially, the acquisition of knowledge.
In a 2014 study, students were better able to answer analytical questions if they took their notes by hand. A 2017 study found that 20-25-year-old students retained the information they wrote by hand longer than the information that they typed on a keyboard.
In addition, it was discovered that students who used artificial intelligence from the stage of their
first draft remembered very little of what was actually written when they were tested for their ability to cite a text, unlike those who had composed their own texts from the draft stage. Finding a balance between written and digital production is, therefore, very important.
Less lexical richness in digitally produced written work
In an experiment conducted in 2019, before the generative AI boom that we know, we compared the handwritten and typewritten productions of students in English. We found a lesser lexical richness in typed productions, which confirmed the trends mentioned above.
There were 58 university participants in the study, each producing a typewritten text and a handwritten text at an interval of one week. The experiment took place as…